Skip to content
Portfolio demo · sample data captured Sep 24, 2026 · no live updates

Explore · US metros

Real-estate markets, ranked without the spin.

A view of the market.
A clear path to the evidence.

Every score graded. Every source dated.

Sample release 9 · Sep 10, 2026

Census 2025 · Albers projection · Natural Earth relief

14 visible map locations. 0 covered markets are outside this view or without a verified location; all remain in the lists.

Score landscape
14 ranked of 31 covered · 17 excluded ↓High 70 · median 44.5 · low 28

17 unavailable values are not plotted.

Explore a market

Investment strategy

US metros · STR

High 70 · Low 28

Score is relative to this cohort. Letters describe data quality; regulation is separate.

Explore the rankings

Select a location to explore.
Shift + click to compare markets.

Frozen sample from release 9 published

Covered markets
41
US metros
31
Europe cities
10
LTR ranked
29

14 ranked · 31 covered · 17 excluded. 14 ranked markets match current filters.

Quick:Under $300KUnder $500K

Ranking 14 of 31 covered markets

See who’s excluded and why (17)
17 excluded — missing critical: modeled_adr; missing critical: modeled_occupancy; missing critical: active_str_listings; regulation badge: stale (unknown)

Clewiston, FL · Abilene, TX · Orangeburg, SC · DuBois, PA · Monroe, LA · Somerset, KY · Oil City, PA · Sandusky, OH · Pontiac, IL · Freeport, IL · Indiana, PA · Lewistown, PA · Binghamton, NY · Shawano, WI · Stevens Point, WI · Peoria, IL · Boise City, ID

Data-quality grade

How complete, fresh, and directly-sourced this score’s inputs are — not a judgment of the market itself.

AFull, fresh, directly-observed inputs.BComplete inputs with minor gaps or one modeled component.CUsable inputs with a modeled or aging component.DHeavily modeled, aging, or incomplete inputs.
Ranked markets — 14 of 14 shown
RankMarketScoreDriving factorsRegulation
1Rochester, NY

$289K · Typical home value (ZHVI)Observedas of

70DData-quality grade D: Heavily modeled, aging, or incomplete inputs.
Regulation friendlinessCurated
100
Modeled gross yield proxyDerived
6.9%46
Friendly
2Columbus, OH

$332.8K · Typical home value (ZHVI)Observedas of

69DData-quality grade D: Heavily modeled, aging, or incomplete inputs.
Modeled gross yield proxyDerived
8.1%62
Regulation friendlinessCurated
70
Permit required
3Chicago, IL

$360.3K · Typical home value (ZHVI)Observedas of

Capped

69DData-quality grade D: Heavily modeled, aging, or incomplete inputs.
Modeled gross yield proxyDerived
11.0%100
Saturation (inverted)Derived
97
Restricted
4New Orleans, LA

$263.8K · Typical home value (ZHVI)Observedas of

Capped

65DData-quality grade D: Heavily modeled, aging, or incomplete inputs.
Modeled gross yield proxyDerived
11.0%100
Regulation friendlinessCurated
25
Restricted
5Providence, RI

$529.8K · Typical home value (ZHVI)Observedas of

53DData-quality grade D: Heavily modeled, aging, or incomplete inputs.
Modeled gross yield proxyDerived
6.7%44
Regulation friendlinessCurated
70
Permit required
6Denver, CO

$566.5K · Typical home value (ZHVI)Observedas of

Capped

47DData-quality grade D: Heavily modeled, aging, or incomplete inputs.
Modeled gross yield proxyDerived
6.3%38
Saturation (inverted)Derived
100
Restricted
7Boston, MA

$742.3K · Typical home value (ZHVI)Observedas of

Capped

46DData-quality grade D: Heavily modeled, aging, or incomplete inputs.
Modeled gross yield proxyDerived
6.3%38
Saturation (inverted)Derived
98
Restricted
8Portland, OR

$549.2K · Typical home value (ZHVI)Observedas of

Capped

43DData-quality grade D: Heavily modeled, aging, or incomplete inputs.
Saturation (inverted)Derived
96
Modeled gross yield proxyDerived
5.9%33
Restricted
9Salem, OR

$455.4K · Typical home value (ZHVI)Observedas of

Capped

42DData-quality grade D: Heavily modeled, aging, or incomplete inputs.
Saturation (inverted)Derived
100
Modeled gross yield proxyDerived
5.7%30
Restricted
10Seattle, WA

$740.6K · Typical home value (ZHVI)Observedas of

Capped

38DData-quality grade D: Heavily modeled, aging, or incomplete inputs.
Saturation (inverted)Derived
84
Modeled gross yield proxyDerived
5.5%28
Restricted
11Washington, DC

$579.8K · Typical home value (ZHVI)Observedas of

Capped

38DData-quality grade D: Heavily modeled, aging, or incomplete inputs.
Saturation (inverted)Derived
96
Modeled gross yield proxyDerived
5.1%22
Restricted
12Asheville, NC

$426.2K · Typical home value (ZHVI)Observedas of

Capped

34DData-quality grade D: Heavily modeled, aging, or incomplete inputs.
Modeled gross yield proxyDerived
7.3%51
Regulation friendlinessCurated
25
Restricted
14Nashville, TN

$455.4K · Typical home value (ZHVI)Observedas of

Capped

32DData-quality grade D: Heavily modeled, aging, or incomplete inputs.
Modeled gross yield proxyDerived
7.1%48
Regulation friendlinessCurated
25
Restricted
16Austin, TX

$424.3K · Typical home value (ZHVI)Observedas of

Capped

28DData-quality grade D: Heavily modeled, aging, or incomplete inputs.
Modeled gross yield proxyDerived
5.5%28
Regulation friendlinessCurated
25
Restricted

Showing 14 of 14 ranked markets.

U.S. STR opportunity radar

Research leads, not investment rankings. Public evidence helps us find overlooked destinations; a location reaches the ranked list only after direct performance data and regulation verification clear the existing gate.

12 active research leads

Evidence ladderEmerging leadCorroborated leadObserved STR presenceRank eligible

Swipe the table to inspect every signal

U.S. short-term-rental research leads — 12 of 12 shown
LocationEvidenceSeasonal-housing signalLicensed STR supplySource period

Ocean City, MD

$429K ·  ACS median home value

Emerging lead

24,763 seasonal-use homes ± 419

83.1% of housing  ·  Census proxy, not listings

Not yet verifiedas of

Ocean City, NJ

$840.5K ·  ACS median home value

Emerging lead

14,042 seasonal-use homes ± 417

66.3% of housing  ·  Census proxy, not listings

Not yet verifiedas of

Miami Beach, FL

$556.7K ·  ACS median home value

Emerging lead

13,380 seasonal-use homes ± 750

21.2% of housing  ·  Census proxy, not listings

Not yet verifiedas of

North Myrtle Beach, SC

$416.9K ·  ACS median home value

Emerging lead

13,347 seasonal-use homes ± 728

48.3% of housing  ·  Census proxy, not listings

Not yet verifiedas of

Fort Lauderdale, FL

$486.7K ·  ACS median home value

Emerging lead

12,715 seasonal-use homes ± 890

12.5% of housing  ·  Census proxy, not listings

Not yet verifiedas of

Bonita Springs, FL

$497.1K ·  ACS median home value

Emerging lead

11,877 seasonal-use homes ± 680

29.8% of housing  ·  Census proxy, not listings

Not yet verifiedas of

Cape Coral, FL

$373.5K ·  ACS median home value

Emerging lead

11,807 seasonal-use homes ± 851

11.7% of housing  ·  Census proxy, not listings

Not yet verifiedas of

Panama City Beach, FL

$441.3K ·  ACS median home value

Emerging lead

11,177 seasonal-use homes ± 630

52.7% of housing  ·  Census proxy, not listings

Not yet verifiedas of

Palm Desert, CA

$542K ·  ACS median home value

Emerging lead

9,988 seasonal-use homes ± 633

27% of housing  ·  Census proxy, not listings

Not yet verifiedas of

Palm Springs, CA

$604K ·  ACS median home value

Emerging lead

9,975 seasonal-use homes ± 481

27.1% of housing  ·  Census proxy, not listings

Not yet verifiedas of

Four Corners, FL

$351.8K ·  ACS median home value

Emerging lead

9,615 seasonal-use homes ± 1,001

25.6% of housing  ·  Census proxy, not listings

Not yet verifiedas of

Marco Island, FL

$896.3K ·  ACS median home value

Emerging lead

9,100 seasonal-use homes ± 476

49.2% of housing  ·  Census proxy, not listings

Not yet verifiedas of

Seasonal-use housing can include second homes and is never counted as active STR supply. Read the Radar methodology.

Europe STR demand

Ranked only by the full-year guest nights in this snapshot, as reported by participating booking platforms to Eurostat. Unadjusted YoY change is shown as context, not as a ranking factor, and can reflect changes in platform participation. This is platform demand — not revenue, ADR, occupancy, legal suitability, or investment return. See methodology.

Ranking 10 of 10 covered markets

Data-quality grade

How complete, fresh, and directly-sourced this score’s inputs are — not a judgment of the market itself.

AFull, fresh, directly-observed inputs.BComplete inputs with minor gaps or one modeled component.CUsable inputs with a modeled or aging component.DHeavily modeled, aging, or incomplete inputs.
Ranked markets — 10 of 10 shown
RankMarketDemand scoreGuest nights / unadjusted YoYLegal status · not scored
1Paris
100AData-quality grade A: Full, fresh, directly-observed inputs.

26,299,564/yrObserved

as of

11.9% YoY

Unknown
2Rome
100AData-quality grade A: Full, fresh, directly-observed inputs.

18,775,424/yrObserved

as of

19.9% YoY

Unknown
3Barcelona
99AData-quality grade A: Full, fresh, directly-observed inputs.

13,179,021/yrObserved

as of

5.6% YoY

Restricted
4Madrid
99AData-quality grade A: Full, fresh, directly-observed inputs.

12,321,894/yrObserved

as of

4.5% YoY

Unknown
5Lisbon
99AData-quality grade A: Full, fresh, directly-observed inputs.

11,600,764/yrObserved

as of

2.5% YoY

Unknown
6Milan
98AData-quality grade A: Full, fresh, directly-observed inputs.

9,944,452/yrObserved

as of

11.8% YoY

Unknown
7Budapest
98AData-quality grade A: Full, fresh, directly-observed inputs.

9,330,885/yrObserved

as of

13.7% YoY

Unknown
8Athens
97AData-quality grade A: Full, fresh, directly-observed inputs.

8,824,229/yrObserved

as of

10.4% YoY

Unknown
9Nice
97AData-quality grade A: Full, fresh, directly-observed inputs.

8,697,965/yrObserved

as of

10.2% YoY

Unknown
10Málaga
97AData-quality grade A: Full, fresh, directly-observed inputs.

7,457,508/yrObserved

as of

13.3% YoY

Unknown

Showing 10 of 10 ranked markets.